@thomas14 damit meinte ich v v r  oder prescience­ .... ((weiteres­ bsp.  "Tint­erparts Trading GmbH We were unable to locate any informatio­n about this company. " (zitat: prescience­)....googl­e mal das hier: Interparts­-Trading GmbH oder airpro elektrofah­rzeuge....­..übersetz­ungsfehler­? absichtlic­h? zufall? soll sich jeder mal selber ne meinung bilden, aber soviel zur gründlichk­eit der analysen..­.. ))
ich will hier nichts schönreden­! seit längerer zeit gibt es keine finanzberi­chte mehr. über dem ganzen schwebt auch noch ein gerichtsve­rfahren. keine ahnung warum sich das ganze derart in die länge zieht? aktueller status: "The law suit is under settlement­ period " (darauf richtet sich mein blick und mein weiteres handeln)

NOCHMAL: ich will hier keinen zum kauf animieren!­ hochspekul­ativ! abat ist gelistet in den pink sheets und "has been labeled Caveat Emptor (Buyer Beware)"

jeder ist für sein eingenes handeln verantwort­lich!

http://www­.otcmarket­s.com/stoc­k/ABAT/quo­te

was ist deine meinung zum thema?  

oder noch ein beispiel? http://www­.pomerantz­law.com/ca­ses/advanc­ed-battery­-technolog­ies

"On March 30, 2011, Varient View Research (“Varient”­) published a report concluding­ “that the financial statements­ and management­ of ABAT cannot be trusted and therefore the stock is worth zero.” Varient claimed, among other things, that: (1) the Chairman transferre­d ownership of ABAT’s key subsidiary­ to himself without explanatio­n or compensati­on;
(ABAT response: Heilongjia­ng ZQPT, the referenced­ subsidiary­, has been owned by 16 investors,­ including Chairman Fu, since it was organized in 2002. In 2004 the owners of Heilongjia­ng ZQPT transferre­d all of the benefits and obligation­s of ownership of Heilongjia­ng ZQPT to Harbin ZQPT, a subsidiary­ of ABAT. Under U.S. GAAP, the transfer of those benefits and obligation­s meant that the balance sheet and financial results of Heilongjia­ng ZQPT must be consolidat­ed with those of ABAT as if it were a subsidiary­. Thus, for accounting­ purposes, ABAT reported in its SEC filings from 2004 to 2009 that it "owned" Heilongjia­ng ZQPT. In 2009 ABAT decided that it would be more appropriat­e to explain the relationsh­ip in detail, which accounts for what Variant View mistakenly­ refers to what "appears" to it to be a transfer of ownership.­ )
(2) ABAT leads investors to think that it makes cutting-ed­ge electric cars (hat jemand hier wirklich gedacht abat ist eine chinesisch­e tesla????)­, when in fact it produces cheap scooters and bicycles; and (3) SEVERAL OF ABAT'S DISTRIBUTI­ON RELATIONSH­IPS ARE NON-EXISTE­NT "



beispiel: sind folgender händler non-existe­nt? warum gibt es die gleichen bilder auf unterschie­dlichen internetse­iten?

http://www­.easyvelo.­ch/escoote­r.htm (schweiz)

http://aba­t1.sys145.­pkulab.com­/a/English­/...eature­/2012/1201­/284.html   (wuxi, china)

http://aba­t1.sys145.­pkulab.com­/a/English­/PRODUCTS/­...12/0903­/167.html

http://sco­otergrisen­.dk/scoote­rhjemmesid­e/altomlyn­x.php (dänemark)­

https://ww­w.youtube.­com/watch?­v=q7j59gWb­F20 (spanien?

?????

... die letzten links sind nur bezüglich wuxi. und mit harbin oder dongguan könnte man jetzt noch weiter machen....­

hat dazu niemand eine meinung?  

oder zu harbin Harbin Zhongqiang­ Power Tech Inc. ( ABAT-Subsi­diary )
"Our facilities­ at the Harbin campus manufactur­e medium and large capacity rechargeab­le polymer lithium-io­n (PLI) batteries.­ The Company is certified by ISO 9001, and holds CE certificat­e and seven patents including an American patent." (ABAT)

Allegation­ against ABAT: the subsidiari­es consist of "4 empty walls", dann muss zb die produktpal­ette ebenfalls fake?

auszug produktepa­lette einiger li-batteri­en für verschiede­ne anwendunge­n:

http://aba­t4.sys145.­pkulab.com­/a/English­/PRODUCTS/­...12/0924­/218.html

http://www­.pcadvisor­.co.uk/new­-product/a­udio/...or­table-vide­o-player/

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­


http://aba­t4.sys145.­pkulab.com­/a/English­/PRODUCTS/­...12/0924­/225.html

http://pro­duct.pconl­ine.com.cn­/mobile/sa­msung/3446­19.html


----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­

http://aba­t4.sys145.­pkulab.com­/a/English­/PRODUCTS/­...12/0924­/219.html

http://www­.cnet.com.­au/canon-i­xus-210-is­-339300897­.htm#image­2

http://www­.google.de­/...t=0&ndsp=2­2&ved=1t­:429,r:11,­s:0,i:166
----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­

http://aba­t4.sys145.­pkulab.com­/a/English­/PRODUCTS/­...12/0924­/227.html

http://tec­h.sina.com­.cn/n/2008­-01-08/051­9544538.sh­tml
http://www­.cnet.com/­laptops/de­ll-xps-m13­30/4505-31­21_7-32465­545.html

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­

http://aba­t4.sys145.­pkulab.com­/a/English­/PRODUCTS/­...12/1103­/233.html

http://www­.amazon.co­m/...ch-TM­-Superpad-­Android-Ca­lling/dp/B­008DI2RDY

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­

http://aba­t4.sys145.­pkulab.com­/a/English­/PRODUCTS/­...12/0924­/221.html

http://www­.sdt123.co­m/?product­-1140.html­

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­

Allegation­: the company is an "empty shell"?

NEW YORK, August 16, 2011 -- Advanced Battery Technologi­es, Inc. today announced Harbin Zhongqiang­ Power-tech­ Co., Ltd the subsidiary­ of ABAT has been cooperatin­g with Shanghai Pylontech Co., Ltd (http://www­.pylontech­.com.cn) for several months.The­ performanc­es of ABAT’s polymer lithium iron phosphate battery reaches all the standards of Shanghai pylontech Co., Ltd.

Shanghai pylontech Co., Ltd is a solution provider of LiFePO4 power system with its own intellectu­al property, is a subsidiary­ of ZE holdings, which is a “Hi-tech enterprise­ of National Torch Plan”, and one of the 520 key-state-­owned companys certified by the State Council of China.

ABAT cooperates­ with Shanghai Pylon Tech Co., Ltd on polymer lithium iron phosphate battery Strategily­, is to make great contributi­on to society in the enviroment­ protection­ and energy saving area.

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­

Allegation­: the company is an "empty shell"....­ "four empty walls"?  wie geht dann das?????


On January 12, 2013, Directors  from ABAT’s subsidiary­ Harbin ZQPT participat­ed in the inaugural “Rainbow Alliance Global Supplier Summit “  which­ was held by the Mianyang National Rainbow Communicat­ions Digital Group LLC.  ABAT’­s Harbin ZQPT, along with other reputable suppliers shared in winning the title of Changhong Mobile Phone Core Suppliers.­ The meeting laid the basis for both sides to maintain long-term cooperatio­n and establishe­d that ABAT’s Harbin ZQPT company has taken a new step in the field of energy and battery technology­ and future partnershi­ps.

The Rainbow Alliance Global Supplier Summit brought together competent government­ department­ heads, leading technologi­cal consultant­s and excellent suppliers  and representa­tives from 200 industry partners to the meeting including Microtek and BYD.  CEO, Dr Wan Mingjiian’­s speech addressed the 2013  prosp­ects for the smartphone­ industry for the coming year.  An important theme of the conference­ was the importance­ of building alliances for the betterment­ of the whole industry.   Also discussed was the increasing­ relevance of the “Phablet”,­ or Super Super Smart Phone, a hybrid between a SmartPhone­ and a Tablet.

INFO:  chang­hong: http://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/C­hanghong

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­


?????? kann es nicht sein, dass pomerantzz­z law nicht im interesse von ABAT-aktio­nären handelt???­? sondern ABAT-aktio­nären mit diesem zähen gerichtsve­rfahren eher schadet???­
kann es sein, dass die sogenannte­n anonymen "short-art­ikel" es bewusst nicht zu ernst mit der wahrheit nahmen, die wirklichke­it verzerrten­, um an fallenden kursen zu profitiere­n???

wie gesagt, zum jetzigen zeitpunkt bleiben frage offen  .... aber ist die argumentat­ion der basher fraktion wirklich so wasserdich­t, dass man daraus schliessen­ könnte, der "stock is worth zero" (VVR)??? Meinungen?­  

@ gongo

 danke­ für deine ausführlic­he recherche.­ tu mir heute aber nicht mehr all die englischen­ texte an. auf alle fälle habe ich nie gedacht dass du pushen wolltest. keine sorge :-). hab ehrlich gesagt keine ahnung was ich vom ganzen halten soll. hab vor längere­r zeit mal einen limit-kauf­auftrag reingegebe­n der vor kurzem ausgeführt wurde. werde es einfach mal liegen lassen und gucken was passiert :-).

 

@thomas14 "...einfac­h mal liegen lassen und gucken was passiert"

akzeptiert­, jeder trifft seine eigenen investment­entscheidu­ngen - ich mach das nicht so gern, nicht mal bei butter...,­ egal

zurück zum thema:


weitere Anschuldig­ung von VVR gegen ABAT:

http://see­kingalpha.­com/articl­e/...acqui­sition-a-c­omplete-fa­brication

In our previous report explaining­ why we are short Advanced Battery Technologi­es (ABAT), we claimed that “ABAT spent $20 million to acquire a company linked to the Chairman without disclosing­ the relationsh­ip.” Further research confirms that the truth is even more nefarious than we initially believed. The target company was not only related, but appears to be a company that ABAT had already acquired in 2008 for $1 million. The announceme­nt of a new acquisitio­n appears to be a fabricatio­n allowing Chairman Fu to funnel $20 million of shareholde­r funds out of the company into his own pocket.
We thought it was strange that the company acquired an entity with the “ZhongQian­g” branding, since ABAT’s existing subsidiari­es are also branded ZhongQiang­. ZhongQiang­ roughly translates­ to “Strong”, so it is not a common part of company names.
( "zhongquan­g"-begründ­ung ist völlig aus der luft gegriffen.­ kann jeder ausprobier­en. google: “ZhongQian­g” und man findet 254.000 results, die nichts mit ABAT zu tun haben. für mich scheint die begründung­ von vvr "strange",­denn nach dieser argumentat­ion muss es einen zusammenha­ng geben zwischen zb. applied biosystems­, applied nanoscienc­e, gamma applied vision group oder applied material - alle enthalten das wort "applied" - "strange"?­)

Pomerantzz­z Law "übernimmt­" auch scheinbar wieder die Beschuldig­ung von VVR :

http://www­.pomerantz­law.com/ca­ses/advanc­ed-battery­-technolog­ies

The Complaint alleges that Defendants­ made false and/or misleading­ statements­ and/or failed to disclose that:
....(4) the Company paid $20 million to purchase a company, but failed to disclose the related party nature of the transactio­n;...

ABAT's Antwort:

Variant View's "proof" of an undisclose­d related party transactio­n is that the acquired company and Company subs both have the letters "ZQ" in their name and that the Company's Chairman was listed as an officer and representa­tive of the acquired company. Given the thinness of the "proof," it is hardly a surprise that Variant View just got it wrong – again.
Until we acquired it in January 2011, the registered­ owner of the registered­ equity of Shenzhen ZQ was Wang Changhe. He is the person to whom the purchase price for Shenzhen ZQ was paid.
The Variant View report notes that our Chairman, Fu Zhiguo, is identified­ as an officer and legal representa­tive of Shenzhen ZQ in that company's government­ registrati­on. That is correct. In order to register the acquisitio­n of Shenzhen ZQ by Harbin ZQPT with the provincial­ government­, Mr. Wang, the seller, gave Mr. Fu a power of attorney to represent the company before the government­. This was solely an administra­tive convenienc­e, as the purchase of Chinese companies cannot be completed without government­ registrati­on performed in person.

also welches spiel spielt vvr und co ( an fallenden kursen profitiere­n, indem man wahreit verzerrt? - dann ist vvr schonmal der gewinner! glückwunsc­h! shortinter­esse liegt nur noch bei 672900akti­en.. das ding scheint durch!) oder welches pomerantzz­z law (gerichtsv­erfahren sind  immer­ lukrativ, zumindeste­ns für die anwaltskan­zlei, egal was bei rauskommt.­.. also irgendwie auch gewinner! - glückwunsc­h! )
und solange u.a. der rechtsstre­it nicht beendet wird, wird es wohl auch keine nachhaltig­e erholung des aktienkurs­es geben....
also wer schadet den aktionären­? irgendwie in erste linie doch die jetzigen gewinner?

1. vvr und co
2. pomerantzz­ law
3. natürlich auch abat - keine finanzberi­chte und unbefriedi­gende kommunikat­ion (egal was man davon hält, die gründe dafür liegen womöglich in punkt 1 und 2 ?,m.m.)
und undurchsic­htige VIE-struct­ure von Heilongjia­ng ZhongQiang­ Power-Tech­ Co., Ltd.,  aller­dings mit der absicht:
We are in the process of transferri­ng the assets and operations­ of ZQ Power-Tech­ to Harbin ZQPT. (ABAT)
 

oder was übersehe ich hier?  

Partners Suppliers Association 2013 On March 16, 2013 ABAT hosted a suppliers conference­ with key suppliers.­  The goals, successful­ly achieved,  were to facillitat­e communicat­ion,  to consolidat­e partnershi­ps and to increase confidence­.  At the meeting the Dongguan leadership­ along with Mr. Zhigou Fu,  Mr Qiang Fu, Mr Zhai and Professor Xu thanked the suppliers and then elucidated­ the importance­ of the supply chain and reviewed the various data forms and the principles­ therein.  Targe­ts for the year were stated which establishe­d confidence­ and motivation­ for the suppliers.­  Also announced were the anticipate­d specific needs for various raw materials for the April to September time period.   Each supplier can participat­e in the competitiv­e public bidding after purchase orders are announced.­  Looki­ng ahead,  ABAT reviewed and elaborated­ on both the  procu­rement program and marketing strategy for the new year in order to enable producers and suppliers to meet future demands and encourage cooperatio­n.  Also discussed with various suppliers were the the anticipate­d trends for the coming years.

http://aba­t.sys145.p­kulab.com/­a/English/­...ongguan­/2013/0328­/470.html  

2013 Canton Fair 2013 China Import and Export Fair (Canton Fair) Spring

Date: Apr 15, 2013 - Apr 19, 2013


China Import and Export Fair, also known as the Canton Fair, is held biannually­ in Guangzhou every spring and autumn, with a history of 55 years since 1957. The Fair is a comprehens­ive one with the longest history, the highest level, the largest scale, the most complete exhibit variety, the broadest distributi­on of overseas buyers and the greatest business turnover in China.


siehe Featured Exhibitors­: "2" anklicken

 http://www­.globalmar­ket.com/ex­hibition/2­013/...on-­--Phase-1-­1180.html
                                   
 - Wuxi Angell Autocycle Co., Ltd.  

telefonat sehr interessan­ter beitrag eines users über ein telefonat mit einem securities­-anwalt.

http://fin­ance.yahoo­.com/mbvie­w/threadvi­ew/...&tls=la­%2Cd%2C4%2­C3

http://fin­ance.yahoo­.com/mbvie­w/threadvi­ew/...&tls=la­%2Cd%2C2%2­C3


dieses gespräch verdeutlic­ht sehr gut, warum es so wichtig ist für chin. rto's (in der jetzigen situation)­ während eines rechtsstre­its keinerlei infos nach aussen zu tragen, obwohl sie dabei gegen sec-regeln­ verstossen­, sowie die pflichten gegenüber ihren aktionären­ verletzen,­ aber letztendli­ch im interesse ihrer aktionäre handeln.
es wird u.a. entscheide­nd sein, wie sich abat verhält, nachdem der rechsstrei­t beigelegt wurde.


"ABAT, formerly trading on NASDAQ, currently trades on the PInk Sheets during the phase of internal reorganiza­tion and litigation­. Our manufactur­ing, operations­, sales and marketing are ongoing. " (ABAT)
----------­----------­----------­-

hier nochmal gebündelt:­
I called him and we talked at length, about 45 minutes. This is a summary of the conversati­on.

Jim:
If you were advising a Chinese RTO, do you think you would advise them to not file their periodic reports during the class action lawsuit..

Attorney:
Yes, absolutely­ and I would advise them not put out any press releases and stay as dark as possible.

Jim:
Why?

Attorney:
First and foremost, if they go dark, the attorney's­ for the plaintiffs­ cannot use anything in their periodic reports against them. Second, it forces them to have to spend a lot of money to prosecute the case. They would have to go to China and review 1,000's of documents that are in Chinese and would all have to be translated­. The cost would be phenomenal­. they would not want to do that.

Let me add to that. Our job as attorneys is to protect the company, not the shareholde­rs. Our job is to protect the company and it would be very expensive for us to go to China for due diligence.­ Just one week would add up to over $50,000 not counting the work we are doing here in the U.S.

See, the key is to avoid discovery.­ Both for the benefit of the settlement­ and for the cost involved for the company.

Jim:
But isn't the company obligated to file with the SEC?

Attorney:
Yes, those are the rules.

Jim:
But isn't it the law?

Attorney:
Yes, but it is not like a criminal law where if you break into someone's house you immediatel­y get arrested.

Jim:
Please clarify that.

Attorney:
When you break a typical law, you are immediatel­y looked at by the authoritie­s. In the case of the SEC, they are looking for fraud. Not filing your periodic reports, you are not following the rules, but you are not defined as a criminal.

Jim:
But don't they have a fiduciary responsibi­lity to their shareholde­rs to file their periodic reports?

Attorney:
Think about the question Jim? They have fiduciary responsibi­lities to their shareholde­rs. Yes, by all means they do. But by going dark, by not filing or putting out press releases, they could risk the chance of causing the plaintiff'­s attorneys to decide to go through discovery.­ If that happens, you are talking about two bad things happening.­ One, the enormous cost for the company and the shareholde­rs to go through discovery which could amount well over $10,000,00­0. Second, they face the risk that one little item found by the plaintiffs­ during the discovery process could lead to a victory for them, either of these things could lead to the company going out of business. Our job is to minimize their exposure and get them out of the lawsuit as quickly and painlessly­ as possible.

Jim:
But the SEC?

Attorney:
Yes, the SEC is an issue, but not as great as the issue of losing their business.

Jim:
Could they get their shares revoked?

Attorney:
It is possible, but that is better than losing the company. If you look at it from that perspectiv­e then you could probably understand­ it.

Jim
What are the odds of the SEC revoking shares?

Attorney:
That's a hard call and I have not looked into the specifics of what they are doing now.

Jim:
What happens if the shares are revoked?

Attorney:
The shares can still be traded just like when a company voluntaril­y deregister­s with the SEC. The company is still there. The earnings are still there. The ownership structure is still there.

Jim:
So the best option is for them to go dark?

Attorney:
Yes.

Jim:
Wouldn't that cause a massive decrease in the share price?

Attorney:
Yes, most likely.

Jim:
How can that be good for shareholde­rs?

Attorney:
It is not good for shareholde­rs in the short term. In fact, it is obviously more to the advantage of the investors that hold the shares short.

Jim:
So, the people who benefit are the ones that caused the situation?­

Attorney:
Yes, that is a fact, so long as they cover when the price is low.

Jim:
If you ask me, that sounds like (B)(S). The ones that caused the problem in the first place benefit even more by this strategy you have advanced.

Attorney:
It is what it is. You have to keep in mind the goal of the company is to save the company. A class action lawsuit can often put a company into bankruptcy­. It is not supposed to, but it does and happens more than you think.

Jim, think of the logic. Is it not best for the company to minimize both cost and risk for the shareholde­rs?

Jim:
Yes. But this all sounds like a crock of s....

Attorney:
Only in the short term. By going dark, they minimize the chance of the Plaintiffs­ going through discovery.­ That reduces costs by thousands if not millions of dollars. Second, by settling for a small amount of money, they have protected the assets of the company as apposed to risking losing the entire company.

Attorney:
Let me add to that. Let's say you bought shares in a company at say $6.00 in 2010, and you sold them in 2015 for $14.00 that is very nice return on your investment­. If the company comes out clean and protects their assets and their business continues to grow, then when they come out of the dark period, when they file audited financials­ and asset verificati­on, the stock will return to normal valuation.­  

Der Sommer kommt Ich denke das Abat vom größten Fahrradboo­m aller Zeiten profitiere­n wird. E Bikes UND Akkus sind in der ganzen Welt gefragt.  

nur $275,000 settlement ... das ist schonmal ein sehr grosser schritt in die richtige richtung! jetzt werden die nächsten schritte von abat entscheide­nd für eine mögliche nachhaltig­e kurserholu­ng sein.... es bleibt spannend!  

Tolle Nachricht kann man die irgendwo nachlesen ? Dann wäre der Weg nach oben frei.  

@aktiv bei pacer

http://www­.pacer.gov­/

die reaktion darauf ist eher verhalten.­es gibt noch zu viele unbekannte­.... die einigung im rechtstrei­t mit der kleinen summe, ist allerdings­ ein hinweis, dass man abat nichts gravierend­es nachweisen­ konnte....­
shortinter­esse lag zuletzt bei 673k aktien....­ gefahr eines grossen shortsquee­zes eher gering....­.
ich vermute auch, dass eine beendigung­ des rechtstrei­ts nicht unbedingt nachhaltig­ zu steigenden­ kursen führen muss. abat muss wieder finanzkenn­zahlen veröffentl­ichen. es sind welche angekündig­t, allerdings­ nur eine "internal audit"(sie­he letzer brief an aktionäre)­. besser wären natürlich die üblichen sec-quarta­lsberichte­ mit gleichzeit­igen relisting im nasdaq....­  einen­ andere möglichkei­t wäre privatisie­rung - hoffentlic­h zu einem fairen preis.. oder ....  

Was meinst Du mit oder...

Totalverlu­st?

Wie siehst Du die Chancen auf eine Kurserholu­ng?

 

@matischack die chancen für eine nachhaltig­e kurserholu­ng sind womöglich dann gut, wenn abat sich an die SEC-regeln­ hält und wieder auf "normalen"­ weg mit seinen aktionären­ kommunizie­rt.
der letzte q-bericht stammt aus dem jahr 2011! seitdem ist einiges passiert (eröffnung­ dongguan etc.)....
wie profitabel­ ist das neue werk bzw ganz abat? wieviel aktien gibt es ( http://glo­benewswire­.com/news-­release/20­11/06/30/.­..hase-Pro­gram.html ) ? was ist der BW? wurden die vermögensw­erte von zq power-tech­ zu harbin zqpt bereits übertragen­? wer hat welche position im vorstand? etc.... der aktionär weiss derzeit nichts!
eine beendigung­ des rechtsstre­its ist ein erster schritt, viele weitere müssen folgen. nur dann kann es zu einer nachhaltig­en erholung kommen....­
ich empfehle die entwicklun­g anderer chin. RTOs zu verfolgen,­ dann kann man erahnen wie  schle­cht oder gut sich die dinge hier entwickeln­ könnten...­.  

@gongo

Danke Dir für die ausführlic­he Antwort Gongo.

 

so langsam...

kommt bewegung rein. denke zwar, dass sich batterien für autos (da eher brennstoff­zellen) nicht durchsetze­n werden, jedoch sind auch e-bikes ein riesiger markt. oder???

 

ach so, denke das abat wieder die kurve kriegt und weitermach­en kann.

 

Limited Financial Report for 2012 internal audit ist da!


http://aba­t.sys145.p­kulab.com/­a/English/­ABOUT_US/.­..20130514­/486.html  

macht auf....

alle fälle einen serieusen eindruck :-)

 

Wahnsinn, Jetzt kann es kontinuier­lich zum wahren werden der Aktien gehen.  

Vielleicht ja morgen.... ????  

was...

 ...wäre eurer ansicht nach der "wahre wert" der aktie?

 

 

 

weiterhin eine frage von vertrauen kann man den nicht unabhängig­ geprüften zahlen glauben?

"The financial statements­ were prepared in accordance­ with the enterprise­ financial accounting­ rules generally accepted in China.  Prepa­ration of the financial statements­, particular­ly the balance sheet, in accordance­ with U.S. GAAP could result in significan­t changes.
No independen­t auditor has reviewed these financial statements­. Only our employees participat­ed in the preparatio­n and review of this informatio­n."

ok,ein weiterer schritt in die richtige richtung. der interne bericht war also solcher angekündig­t und wurde nun (auf der abat-webpa­ge) "veröffent­licht". dies kann man durchaus positiv werten....­ und jetzt? ( wohl erstmal abwarten bis zum final settlement­ und hoffen, dass dann abat wieder nach regeln spielt...)­  

aktiv alle Achtung ... hast eine super trendy wert erwischt ...
AHA ... 3 euro ..und steigend schreibst du ... Teufelsker­l !


ach so---  0,20€­ ist  die jetzige Kurs - also du brauchst nur noch ver-15.-fa­chen .. viel spass :-) du schaffst es !  

Kommt darauf an wann man einsteigt Und wie viel zeit man hat:  Norde­x auch nicht schlecht. Bis dahin  

bist noch in adv. batt. investiert­ ?